Jonah Goldberg: House Republicans need a sudden onset of political maturity. What are the chances?

Israeli diplomat Abba Eban famously said that the Palestinians “never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” Watching events in the Middle East over the last two weeks, that quote might seem newly relevant.

But it seems even more fitting for the House GOP.

At a time of international and domestic turmoil, with an unpopular incumbent Democratic president languishing in the polls, and the Republican presidential primary dominated by a many-times indicted election denier, it doesn’t take a Solon to realize it would be a good idea for the Republican House majority to strike a collective pose of reassuring competence.

But they chose to go another way.

On Tuesday, Majority Whip Tom Emmer of Minnesota, the No. 3 ranking Republican in the House, withdrew his bid to succeed Speaker Kevin McCarthy just hours after his party nominated him. This came after weeks of turmoil launched by Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and seven Republican colleagues who voted to oust McCarthy out of spite. In the aftermath, Majority Leader Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana beat Gaetz’s preferred candidate, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, in a Republican election to replace McCarthy. But Jordan’s allies refused to back Scalise, who quickly withdrew his name from the race. Then, after three rounds of voting, Jordan failed to win the election and withdrew.

Jordan’s campaign for the job was remarkable in its hypocrisy. A career congressional bomb-thrower who made a name for himself making life miserable for party leadership, Jordan suddenly embraced the virtues of compromise. He reportedly offered to back a vote on Ukraine aid — anathema to his bloc — and offered moderate New York Republicans a hike in federal tax exemptions for state and local taxes to win over reluctant members. Of course, Jordan was playing good cop while his allies were playing bad cop, using conservative media to whip up political intimidation and even threats to force their capitulation.

As embarrassing as the ongoing turmoil is for Republicans, it was the right call to block Jordan. The idea that 5% of the caucus can impudently defenestrate one speaker, while 95% must support the wreckers’ choice for the “good of the party” is preposterous from every angle.

Still, Republicans could have looked at Jordan’s case of sudden onset political maturity as a learning opportunity, to appreciate how politics — particularly congressional politics — is supposed to work. Politically, speakers are supposed to smooth out differences within their coalition for the good of the whole party. Majorities are always diverse. That’s why speakers are supposed to be traffic cops, not ideological firebrands. The ultimate goal is to advance responsible legislation that ideally leads to expanding the majority.

It was adorable that Jordan and his allies suddenly realized that winning coalitions require internal compromises for the good of the party.

But what Jordan and his allies are still incapable of grasping is that their broader approach to politics is bad for the party and therefore bad for conservatism and America (assuming you think that America needs conservative policies).

Going back more than a decade, the firebrands, mostly from safe seats, have put their own interests ahead of the party’s. Their stunts and schemes — forcing government shutdowns, backing Donald Trump’s fraudulent efforts to steal the election — make it more difficult for Republicans in competitive districts to win election or reelection. They don’t much care if the GOP loses control of Congress. They’re happy to run up the political bill, knowing that moderates will be stuck with the check.